经济管理学刊（中英文版）

不同类型的区域创新政策及其组合对企业创新绩效的影响 — 基于深圳的实证研究

全文下载

作者：Ying Yang, Fei Tang, Pengbin Gao

摘要：

Evaluating the functional boundary of different types of innovation policy instruments and their mixes on innovation performance of enterprises is an important but unresolved key issue. This paper, based on the systematically carding the quantization of 155 innovation policies issued by Shenzhen governmental departments from 2011 to 2019, analyzed the characteristics from different types of innovation instruments and their mixes. The results show that Shenzhen governmental has constantly enriched innovation policy instruments for encouraging enterprise innovation, but there are structural unbalances in the issued innovation policy manifested as follows: firstly supply-side policy and environmental-side policy were promulgated more than demand-side policy; secondly the specific instruments employed by Shenzhen governmental were also uneven in different type of innovation policy, like supply-side policy focused on the instruments of government procurement and R&D outsourcing, demand-side policy employed human resource training, innovation infrastructure and fiscal support most, and environmental-side policy main used target planning, intellectual property protection and financial support. This study expands and understanding empirical implementation of different reginal innovation policy instruments, and has implication for Shenzhen governmental in improving the applicability ability of policies in the enterprises innovation. 

关键词：Regional Innovation Policy; Policy Instruments; Policy Mix; Innovation Performance

参考文献：

[1]      Glaeser E L, Gottlieb J. The Economics of Place-Making Policies[J]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2008(spring): 155-253.

[2]      Zhou Jianghua, Li Jizhen, Liu Zizhen, Li Zibiao. Influence Mechanism of Government’s Innovation Policies on Firm’s Innovation Performance[J]. Technology Economy,2017,36(01):57-65.

[3]      Liu Jing, Hu Liping, Kang Xiaoling, Zhang Xia. Complementation or Substitution: R&D Subsidy and PCP: a Comparative Research based on Innovation Policy Process [J/OL]. Science and Technology Progress and Policy, 2021:1-9

[4]      Nemet, G.F., 2009. Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change. Res. Policy 38, 700-709.

[5]      Peters, M., Schneider, M., Griesshaber, T., Hoffmann, V.H., 2012. The impact of technology-push and demand-pull policies on technical change – does the locus of policies matter? Res. Policy 41, 1296-1308.

[6]      Woolthuis R K, Lankhuizen M, Gilsing V. A system failure framework for innovation policy design[J]. Technovation, 2005, 25(6):609-619.

[7]      Joern, Hoppmann, and, et al. The two faces of market support—How deployment policies affect technological exploration and exploitation in the solar photovoltaic industry[J]. Research Policy, 2013,42(4):989-1003

[8]      Johnson E. Environmental policy analysis for decision making[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2002, 22(4):441

[9]      Ekboir J M. Research and technology policies in innovation systems: zero tillage in Brazil[J]. Research Policy, 2003, 573-586

[10]   Zhou Rui, Li Shuang. An empirical analysis of the influence of science and technology policy factors on innovation of small and medium-sized enterprises [J]. Statistics and Decision, 2011(5): 186-188

[11]   Li Chenguang, Zhang Yongan. Study on Cluster Innovation and Technology Policy with Utility-Response Mechanism[J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2012(10): 24-30

[12]   Peng Jisheng, Sun Wenxiang, Zhong Weiguo. The Evolution of Chinese Technological and Innovation Policies and the empirical research on the performance (1978-2006) [J]. Science Research Management, 2008(04):134-150

[13]   Zhong Weiguo, Peng Jisheng, Sun Wenxiang. Measurement of Policy, Coordination of Policy and Economic Performance: An Empirical Study on Innovation Policy (1978-2006) [J]. Science of Science and Management of S.&.T., 2009,30(03): 54-60+95(in Chinese).

[14]   Rothwell, R., Zegveld, W. Industrial Innovation and Public Policy: Preparing for the 1980s and the 1990s[J]. F. Pinter, 1981: 116-147