经济管理学刊（中英文版）

入境开放式创新、商业模式设计与企业创新绩效

全文下载

作者：Minghui Ma, Weirong Wang, Pengbin Gao, Zhou Zhang

摘要：

Through systematic literature review, this study constructs a relationship model of the impact of inbound open innovation on firm innovation performance, and introduced two-dimensional business model design (novelty and efficiency) as mediation variables. It is preliminary confirmed theoretically that inbound open innovation has a positive impact on firm innovation performance, and the rationality of business model playing a mediation role in the relationship between inbound open innovation and innovation performance. Through questionnaire survey and empirical analysis, it is concluded that inbound open innovation has a positive impact on firm innovation performance; Two-dimensional business model design (novelty and efficiency) play a completely positive mediation role in the relationship between inbound open innovation and innovation performance. Based on these findings, this paper developed recommendations for future research.

关键词：Inbound Open Innovation; Innovation Performance; Novelty-centered Business Model Design; Efficiency-centered Business Model Design

参考文献：

[1]      Chesbrough, profiting from H. Open Innovation: The new imperative for creating and technology[M]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. 2003a.

[2]      Roper, Stephen; Vahter, Priit; Love, James H. Externalities of openness in innovation [J]. Research Policy,2013,42(9): 1544-1554

[3]      Barge-Gil, Andraes. Open Strategies and Innovation Performance [J]. Industry and Innovation,2013,20(7): 585-610

[4]      Yan Chun, Cai Ning. Mechanism of innovation openness on open innovation performance [J]. Scientific Research Management, 2014 (3): 18-24

[5]      Guo Wei. Empirical Study on the impact of innovation openness on enterprise innovation performance [J]. Scientific Research Management, 2016,37 (10): 43-50

[6]      Zheng Jiankang, ye Zheng, Xu Yinjie. Research on the impact mechanism of cluster enterprise openness on innovation performance [J]. Scientific Research Management, 2017 (4): 19-27

[7]      Cruz-Gonzalez Jorge et.al. Open search strategies and firm performance: The different moderating role of technological environmental dynamism [J]. Technovation,2015,35: 32-45

[8]      Ghisetti Claudia et.al. An empirical investigation of eleven European countries [J]. Research Policy,2015,44(5): 1080-1093

[9]      Wang Song, Sheng Ya. Research on cooperation degree, openness and cluster growth performance of cluster innovation network under uncertain environment [J]. Scientific Research Management, 2013 (2): 52-61

[10]   Yang Yinjuan, Chen Jin. Research on the impact of market orientation on innovation performance in open innovation [J]. Scientific Research Management, 2015 (3): 103-110

[11]   Wu Junjie, Sheng Ya. Research on the impact mechanism of network strength and network openness on the performance of Industrial Clusters -- Taking Zhejiang industrial clusters as an example [J]. Economic Geography, 2011, 31 (11): 1867-1873

[12]   Ma Wenjia, Gao liangmou. Research on the relationship between openness and innovation performance -- the regulatory role of dynamic capability [J]. Scientific Research Management, 2016,37 (02): 47-54

[13]   Gassmann, O., Enkel. E. Towards a theory of opera innovation: Three core process archetypes [A]. In: Paper presented at R&D Management Conference, Lisbon, 2004:1-18.

[14]   Mazzola Erica et.al. Open innovation and firms' performance: state of the art and empirical evidences from the bio-pharmaceutical industry [J]. International Journal of Technology Management,2016,70(2-3): 109-134

[15]   Zhang Zhengang, Li Yunjian, Chen Zhiming. The relationship between two-way open innovation and enterprise competitive advantage [J]. Journal of Management, 2014 (11): 1184-1190

[16]   Du, Jingshu; Leten, Bart; Vanhaverbeke, Wim. Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners [J]. Research Policy,2014.43(5): 828-840

[17]   Colin C. J. Cheng, Eelko K. R. E. Huizingh. When Is Open Innovation Beneficial? The Role of Strategic Orientation [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2014,31(6): 1235–1253

[18]   Bianchi, Mattia; Croce, Annalisa; Dell'Era, Claudio; et.al Organizing for Inbound Open Innovation: How External Consultants and a Dedicated R&D Unit Influence Product Innovation Performance [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2016,33(4): 492-510

[19]   Gassmann, O.&Enkel, E. Towards a theory of open innovation: Three core process archetypes. Proceedings of the R&D Management Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, July 6-9, 2004.

[20]   Van de Vrande, V., Lemmens, C.,&Vanhaverbeke,  W.  Choosing governance modes for external technology sourcing. R&D Management, 2006, 36(3), 347-363.

[21]   Wang Pengfei. Research on the impact of outward and open innovation on innovation performance - from the perspective of network embeddedness[D]. Master's thesis, Zhejiang University, 2010

[22]   Zhang Zhengang, Chen Zhiming, Li Yunjian. Research on the relationship between open innovation, absorptive capacity and innovation performance [J]. Scientific Research Management, 2015,36 (03): 49-56

[23]   Gulati R. Network location and learning: Tbe influence of network resourcesand firm capabilities on alliance formation[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20 (5):397一420.

[24]   Miotti, L., Sachwald, F. Co-operative R&D: Why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis [J]. Research Policy, 2003(32): 1481-1499.

[25]   Anne-Laure Mention. Co-operation and co-opetition as open innovation practices in the service sector: Which influence on innovation novelty? [J] Technovation, 2011, 31(1):44-53.

[26]    Rothaermel, F. T., Alexandre, M. T. Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity[J]. Organization Science, 2009(20):759-758.

[27]   Zott C. Amit R. The fit between product market strategy and business model: Implication for firm performance [J]. Strategic; Management Journal, 2008, 29: 1一26

[28]   Chen Yufen, Chen Jin. Impact of openness on enterprise technological innovation performance [J]. Scientific Research, 2008, 26 (2): 419-426